The simplest ( and also most complex if you think about it
too much!) definition of pedagogy is that is that it is the “how” of teaching
(DETE,2013c).
Education Queensland acknowledges the importance of pedagogy
that is guided by research and enacted consistently across a school in
improving teacher effectiveness and hence student outcomes. The department also
acknowledges that the complexity of teaching and learning requires that to be
effective schools need to develop their own, locally specific, set of practices
(DETE,
2012).
Because effective pedagogy must be informed by the context
in which teaching and learning occurs and because the teaching and learning
environment is a conglomeration of interdependent factors at individual, class,
school organisation and socio cultural level, my personal pedagogy will change
over time and with my teaching context.
A background
paper produced by DETE ( 2013c) provides a comprehension overview of pedagogy
within Education Queensland including a
history of pedagogy research, an outline of a variety of pedagogical frameworks
( including Productive Pedagogies) and a set of 10 core principles that are
present across the different frameworks; High expectations, Student centred
planning, Aligned curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, Evidence based decision
making, Targeted and scaffolded
instruction and Safe, supportive, connected and inclusive classroom
environment. I found this document extremely useful in providing perspective
and an understanding of the commonalities between approaches to pedagogy.
An alignment
matrix provided by DETE on its Pedagogical Framework website ( DETE, 2013b)
shows how each framework addresses the core principles listed above and
provides a useful scaffold for evaluating the strenghs of each.
My school currently works with the Dimensions
of teaching and learning (DoTL) ( DETE, 2013a) which is based on a series
of questions that guide teacher practice throughout the teaching and learning
cycle.
·
What do my students already know?
·
What do they need to learn?
·
How do I teach it?
·
How will they demonstrate their learning?
·
How will I know how well my students have
learned it?
·
Where to next?
This framework provides support to align curriculum,
teaching, assessment and reporting. It is student centred and has a focus on
using assessment to inform teaching.
The teaching
and learning aspect of this framework describes a variety of teaching
strategies that can be selected to meet the needs of students and the
curriculum; direct
teaching, interactive
teaching, indirect
teaching and experiential
teaching.
This aspect of DoTL matches my personal understanding of
teaching and learning, which stemmed from my previous
exploration of learning theories, that different strategies and approaches
are chosen by teachers to meet the needs of learners and the requirements of
the curriculum. We need to know our learners, the curriculum and a wide range
of teaching strategies in order to make informed decisions that effectively
support learning.
How does DoTL address the use of technology in the teaching
and learning cycle? This approach does not provide any specific advice about
the use of digital technology.
Pedagogical frameworks such as IMPACT,
Symphony
of Teaching and Learning forefront
student learning outcomes and provide guides for making decisions around how
technology can be used to support this.
NOTE I have recently completed professional development in the IMPACT model and would like to explore it's application to teaching with technology in a later post.
References
Education
Queensland.(2012). United in our pursuit
of excellence: Agenda for improvement 2012-2016. (2012). Retrieved December
21, 2013, from http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/about/strategic/index.html
Queensland Department of Education, Training and
Employment.(2013a). Dimensions of
teaching and learning. Retrieved December 21, 2013, from https://learningplace.eq.edu.au/cx/resources/file/f093f249-05ce-0bde-465a-dbc537683e7a/1/index.html
Queensland Department of Education, Training and
Employment.(2013b). Pedagogical Framework
(website). Retrieved December 21, 2013, from https://learningplace.eq.edu.au/cx/resources/file/f66ebbde-9978-4bfd-e445-b0f06cf4849f/1/index.html
Queensland Department of Education, Training and
Employment.(2013c). Pedagogy and
pedagogical frameworks in Education Queensland-A background paper. Retrieved
December 21,2013, from https://learningplace.eq.edu.au/cx/resources/file/f66ebbde-9978-4bfd-e445-b0f06cf4849f/1/section-03/s03-01.html
It is really interesting how the pedagogical landscape has become very complex over the past two years. Since the singular focus on Productive Pedagogies, and given the choice schools now have with their pedagogical frameworks, there is a richness of perspective emerging. So many frameworks, each with their own synergies and differences. I am really pleased to see how you have situated the direct teaching model within the broader set of approaches so that the richness of pedagogy emerges. And sharing those resources is very generous, thank you.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI think that my post shows that I really struggled with this task and needed to go searching for a starting point. As you say the pedagogical landscape has become complex and I'm unsure of whether my investigations really brought me any closer to forming/ communicating a personal pedagogy. I'm still working on that and I think I will need to step away from my computer and sit quietly with a pen and paper to do it !
Delete